{
  "fictional": true,
  "requiresTailoring": true,
  "toolId": "29-issue-closure-checker",
  "scope": "One fictional source dataset and frozen approved review inputs.",
  "fixture": {
    "input": {
      "values": {
        "asOfDate": "2026-10-08",
        "ruleReference": "Fictional approved policy v1. Fictional reviewer. Replace before use.",
        "requireIndependentReview": "Yes"
      },
      "dataset": {
        "headers": [
          "Issue reference",
          "Status",
          "Closure evidence",
          "Closure date",
          "Validation result",
          "Owner",
          "Validated by"
        ],
        "rows": [
          [
            "fictional-001",
            "Closed",
            "Fictional test",
            "2026-10-07",
            "Passed",
            "Fictional owner",
            "Fictional independent reviewer"
          ],
          [
            "fictional-002",
            "Closed",
            "",
            "2026-10-09",
            "Failed",
            "Fictional owner",
            "Fictional owner"
          ]
        ]
      }
    },
    "result": {
      "status": "Review has unresolved requirements",
      "summary": "2 source rows checked. 1 unresolved rows, 0 policy exceptions, and 0 missing checklist records.",
      "metrics": [
        {
          "label": "Source rows",
          "value": "2"
        },
        {
          "label": "Result rows",
          "value": "2"
        },
        {
          "label": "Unresolved",
          "value": "1"
        },
        {
          "label": "Policy exceptions",
          "value": "0"
        },
        {
          "label": "Missing checklist records",
          "value": "0"
        }
      ],
      "details": [
        "Check proposed issue closures for missing or future closure dates, absent evidence, unsuccessful validation, duplicate issues, and selected independent-review requirements.",
        "Method revision 2026-10-08.task-dataset-review.1.",
        "Frozen review date 2026-10-08.",
        "Approved rule Fictional approved policy v1. Fictional reviewer. Replace before use..",
        "Every source row is preserved. Missing checklist entries use an empty source-row pointer. Duplicate identities remain unresolved in every occurrence.",
        "Exact identifiers and checklist values are case-sensitive. Status comparisons ignore case where the displayed contract names a supported status. Surrounding whitespace in identifiers requires review.",
        "Amounts use exact scaled-integer arithmetic. No source values, dates, quantities, or original bytes are changed.",
        "Mechanical review applies only to the supplied source and customer-approved rules. It does not authenticate evidence, determine legal applicability, approve closure or work, clear a party, submit a filing, or change a source system."
      ],
      "unresolved": [
        "Row 3. fictional-002. Date is after the frozen review date. Closure evidence is missing. Closure validation is not recorded as Passed. The closure reviewer is also the issue owner"
      ]
    },
    "rows": [
      {
        "Row": "2",
        "Reference": "fictional-001",
        "Result": "Closure checks satisfied",
        "Finding": "The supported administrative checks found no exception under the selected rules.",
        "Recorded status": "Closed",
        "Proposed for closure": "Yes",
        "Date": "2026-10-07",
        "Closure evidence": "Fictional test"
      },
      {
        "Row": "3",
        "Reference": "fictional-002",
        "Result": "Unresolved",
        "Finding": "Date is after the frozen review date. Closure evidence is missing. Closure validation is not recorded as Passed. The closure reviewer is also the issue owner",
        "Recorded status": "Closed",
        "Proposed for closure": "Yes",
        "Date": "2026-10-09",
        "Closure evidence": ""
      }
    ]
  }
}