What does the alert coverage analyzer produce?
Map approved monitoring scenarios to dated alert validation results. Identify disabled rules, unresolved scope and ineffective or untested mappings.
The working area above runs the supported reconciler in the browser. It keeps the result inspectable and preserves every unresolved item for responsible review.
What do you need before you start?
- Define approved requirements, one required method per row, and the evidence window with a responsible reviewer.
- Supply three CSV, single-sheet XLSX or dataset JSON files, each up to 2 MB and 5000 rows. XLSX expanded bytes are limited to 10 MB. Formulas are rejected.
- Confirm mapping scope, declared outcomes and evidence sources before relying on the report. The tool does not perform live testing or authenticate these declarations.
What information do you enter?
Prepare only the bounded inputs listed below for this reconciler.
- requirements. Requirement ID, Requirement, Required method, Maximum age days, Independence required, In scope, Approval status, Approved by, Requirement source.
- mappings. Mapping ID, Requirement ID, Activity ID, Scope confirmation.
- activities. Activity ID, Method, Status, Completed on, Evidence reference, Owner, Outcome, Enabled, Independent.
- Organization (required). Name the organization whose approved requirements and evidence you are reviewing.
- Responsible reviewer (required). Name the reviewer who will confirm scope, source authenticity and the approved method.
- Evidence window starts (required). Activity completed before this date remains outside this review.
- Review date (required). Freeze the date for future-date and evidence-age checks.
- Scope and uncertainty (optional). Record exclusions and assumptions. The map does not infer requirements from a framework.
| Field | What to enter | Fictional example |
|---|---|---|
| OrganizationRequired | Name the organization whose approved requirements and evidence you are reviewing. | Northfield Services, fictional |
| Responsible reviewerRequired | Name the reviewer who will confirm scope, source authenticity and the approved method. | |
| Evidence window startsRequired | Activity completed before this date remains outside this review. | 2026-09-22 |
| Review dateRequired | Freeze the date for future-date and evidence-age checks. | 2026-09-22 |
| Scope and uncertaintyOptional | Record exclusions and assumptions. The map does not infer requirements from a framework. |
What you can download
Every result must identify its supplied facts, assumptions and unresolved items.
| Free result | Included downloads |
|---|---|
Enter your information, inspect the on-screen result and keep a browser backup. Editing and direct copies of your entered information stay free. |
These supported outputs are free. No checkout is required. |
Fictional review report (PDF). Editable review report (DOCX). Complete fictional pack (ZIP). Samples require tailoring. These fictional samples use this tool's customer output renderer and require tailoring. They do not establish real provider acceptance.
How does the alert coverage analyzer work?
- 1Freeze requirements and dates
Name the organization and reviewer. Freeze the evidence window and review date. Record exclusions and uncertainty.
- 2Import three sources
Supply approved requirements, explicit mappings and activity results separately. Use the heading templates or inspect the fictional example.
- 3Inspect every mapping
Review missing references, duplicate identifiers, partial scope, method mismatches, completion status, dates, evidence and outcomes.
- 4Keep the reviewed output
Download complete JSON, requirement CSV and exact-byte browser backups free. Purchase one finalized seven-file evidence pack after reviewing the result.
Method and sources
Apply the steps above to the supported inputs. Use the listed source sections to review the rule basis, assumptions and limits.
- NIST SP 800-53A Revision 5 assessment methodologyGeneral basis for specifying assessment methods, scope and evidence. The tool does not import a control baseline. Assessment methodology and tailored assessment procedures.National Institute of Standards and Technology. Reviewed 2026-10-06.
- FFIEC BSA/AML Manual, Suspicious Activity Reporting Examination ProceduresGeneral bank examination context for reviewing monitoring and validation evidence. No SAR decision or filing rule is implemented. Identification, surveillance monitoring and managing alerts.Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. Reviewed 2026-10-06.
Common questions
What information does the alert coverage analyzer need?
Enter requirements. Requirement ID, Requirement, Required method, Maximum age days, Independence required, In scope, Approval status, Approved by, Requirement source; mappings. Mapping ID, Requirement ID, Activity ID, Scope confirmation; activities. Activity ID, Method, Status, Completed on, Evidence reference, Owner, Outcome, Enabled, Independent; organization (required). Name the organization whose approved requirements and evidence you are reviewing; responsible reviewer (required). Name the reviewer who will confirm scope, source authenticity and the approved method. Define approved requirements, one required method per row, and the evidence window with a responsible reviewer.
What does the alert coverage analyzer produce?
Formal PDF and DOCX summaries Complete Excel review with all three source datasets Requirement CSV Complete parsed source and result JSON Delivered-file SHA-256 manifest Review instructions Review unresolved findings and limitations before use.
Who makes the final decision?
A responsible person reviews the result. The map reviews supplied scenario and alert validation records. It does not run transaction monitoring, backtest thresholds, measure false positives or establish detection effectiveness. An enabled rule without a recorded validation result is unresolved.
Is this tool free?
Yes. The on-screen result and listed downloads are free. No checkout is required. Keep local backups and review the stated method and limits.
Can I use the alert coverage analyzer for this task?
Identify products, channels or populations outside configured coverage. The map reviews supplied scenario and alert validation records. It does not run transaction monitoring, backtest thresholds, measure false positives or establish detection effectiveness. An enabled rule without a recorded validation result is unresolved.
What still needs review?
The map reviews supplied scenario and alert validation records. It does not run transaction monitoring, backtest thresholds, measure false positives or establish detection effectiveness. An enabled rule without a recorded validation result is unresolved.
A requirement remains open when any mapping is adverse or unresolved, even if another mapping is supported. Mappings to excluded, invalid or unknown requirements remain source issues.
Only your requirements are evaluated. Full scope and independence are supplied declarations. Multiple required methods need separate requirement rows.