Verify an EU AI Act Article 50 transparency implementation
Record the applicable Article 50 routes, check the supported implementation controls and retain exact evidence, owners and follow-up actions.
Tool available. Run the complete browser-local workflow and inspect the result. Paid export is not active. Entries and files stay in this browser. Sources reviewed 2 August 2026.
Built from fictional sample information using the same exporter as the tool.
EU Article 50 evidence report sampleEU Article 50 action and approval register sampleWhat’s included
Start the review
Give the accountable reviewer the scope, sequence and decision boundary before using the evidence.
- Start Here guide PDF
Read and work the assessment
Review routed requirements and keep control evidence, open actions and the accountable decision in editable records.
- Evidence report PDF
- Control register CSV
- Action and approval register XLSX
Preserve the run
Keep the structured result and exact source and assumptions record for controlled retention.
- Structured evidence record JSON
- Sources and assumptions record
View every output and format
- Start Here guide PDF
- Evidence report PDF
- Control register CSV
- Action and approval register XLSX
- Structured evidence record JSON
- Sources and assumptions record
Who this tool is for
AI governance, product, legal operations and compliance teams implementing Article 50 transparency controls. Check a recorded implementation consistently and keep an evidence trail for every supported transparency subject.
Supported use
- A provider, deployer or combined role recorded for one system, product or content workflow
- Supported disclosure, timing, presentation, marking and detection-evidence controls
- Evidence status, owner, test date and follow-up action for each routed requirement
Have ready
- Organisation, system or workflow, recorded role, accountable owner and assessment date
- The recorded applicability and scope basis for each routed Article 50 subject
- Control status, evidence reference, evidence type, test date, owner and follow-up action
Needs separate review
- Classification of an AI system or disputed provider and deployer roles
- Whether a transparency route or exception applies when the factual position is unresolved
- Conformity certification or requirements outside the supported Article 50 subjects
How it works
- Record the implementationName the system or workflow, role, owner and assessment date.
- Route the requirementsRecord which supported Article 50 routes apply, do not apply or need further review, with the factual basis.
- Test the evidenceSet each control state and record the evidence type, reference, date, owner and required follow-up.
- Export the reviewDownload the report, evidence register, structured record and complete evidence pack.
Where does this task apply?
Choose the guidance set this tool should use. The interface and outputs stay in English.
Check and document your Article 50 transparency controls.
Choose the provider or deployer role, record the routes that apply, and link each implemented control to evidence, an owner and a check date.
The tool records your scope positions. It does not decide whether a system, output, deepfake, public-interest publication or exception falls within Article 50.
The limited transition to 2 December 2026 concerns only Article 50(2) for certain systems placed on the market before 2 August 2026.
What this tool checks
The scope stays narrow so the result is clear and reproducible.
- Records user-confirmed applicability across the supported Article 50 transparency routes.
- Checks disclosure timing, presentation, machine-readable marking and detection evidence where applicable.
- Reports evidence identified, missing, uncertain, not applicable and not assessable with exact source references.
From official material to a working record
Official material sets the basis
Official EU material explains the Article 50 transparency subjects and relevant implementation context.
The tool prepares the operational record
The verifier routes supported subjects and records control evidence, ownership, test dates and unresolved actions in one reproducible review.
Official sources stay visible
Each supported check shows its jurisdiction, source title, source version and review date beside the result. Unsupported cases are rejected rather than estimated.
View this product's official sourcesQuestions before you use the tool
Scope, files, evidence and browser-local handling.
Does the verifier classify our AI system?
No. The organisation records its role and applicability position. Disputed facts or classifications need separate review.
What counts as implemented with evidence?
The tool requires an evidence reference, evidence type, test date and owner before a supported control can be recorded that way.
Is implementation evidence uploaded?
No. The entered system facts, evidence references and generated records remain in this browser.
Does the report certify EU AI Act conformity?
No. It records supported implementation evidence and gaps. It does not certify conformity.
Review the Article 50 implementation
Record the applicable routes, test each supported control and inspect the evidence gaps before export.