What does the ground-truth answer-key manager produce?
Maintain a controlled expected answer, source basis, grading criteria, unacceptable outcomes, version and reviewer for one evaluation item.
Prepare and review the task-specific records in this browser. Inspect consistency findings and retain the complete backup before preparing the finalized pack. Accountable decisions require responsible review.
What do you need before you start?
- Define the named scope, accountable owner and your review basis.
- Retain the actual evidence separately. Recorded links and evidence references are declarations and are not fetched.
- Choose a valid review date. Resolve missing fields, contradictory declarations and date or status findings before relying on the review.
What information do you enter?
The browser workspace asks only for the structured fields listed below.
- Evaluation (required). Name the evaluation suite or controlled test set.
- Item identifier (required). Use a stable identifier that does not disclose sensitive prompt content.
- Prompt or scenario summary (required). Describe the test scenario without adding confidential material that belongs elsewhere.
- Expected answer or behavior (required). Record the reviewer-approved answer, action or refusal behavior.
- Authoritative source reference (required). Link the expected answer to an internal or official source.
- Grading criteria (required). Describe the observable conditions for pass, partial pass and fail.
- Unacceptable outcomes (required). List responses or actions that require failure or escalation.
- Subject-matter reviewer (required). Name the person or role that reviewed the expected result.
- Review date (required). Record the date of the reviewer’s decision.
- Answer-key version (required). Use a controlled version identifier.
- Record status (required). Record whether the item is ready for evaluation use.
| Field | What to enter | Fictional example |
|---|---|---|
| EvaluationRequired | Name the evaluation suite or controlled test set. | Example policy-answer evaluation, fictional |
| Item identifierRequired | Use a stable identifier that does not disclose sensitive prompt content. | EXAMPLE-ITEM-008 |
| Prompt or scenario summaryRequired | Describe the test scenario without adding confidential material that belongs elsewhere. | User asks for the current internal travel approval limit. |
| Expected answer or behaviorRequired | Record the reviewer-approved answer, action or refusal behavior. | Cite the controlled travel policy and state that exceptions require finance approval. |
| Authoritative source referenceRequired | Link the expected answer to an internal or official source. | EXAMPLE-POLICY-TRAVEL-4.2 |
| Grading criteriaRequired | Describe the observable conditions for pass, partial pass and fail. | Pass requires the correct limit, source and exception route. |
| Unacceptable outcomesRequired | List responses or actions that require failure or escalation. | Invented limit, missing source or approval without authority. |
| Subject-matter reviewerRequired | Name the person or role that reviewed the expected result. | Finance policy owner |
| Review dateRequired | Record the date of the reviewer’s decision. | 2026-09-16 |
| Answer-key versionRequired | Use a controlled version identifier. | 1.0 |
| Record statusRequired | Record whether the item is ready for evaluation use.Choose from Draft, In review, Approved, Needs update, Retired. | Draft |
What you can download
Every result must identify its supplied facts, assumptions and unresolved items.
| Free result | Included downloads |
|---|---|
Enter your information, inspect the on-screen result and keep a browser backup. Editing and direct copies of your entered information stay free. |
These supported outputs are free. No checkout is required. |
How does the ground-truth answer-key manager work?
- 1Prepare the named records
Use the task-specific fields above. Retain original evidence separately and record exact references and versions.
- 2Review internal consistency
Choose the review date. Inspect each scope identity, contradictory declaration, missing decision support and date or status finding.
- 3Keep recoverable work
Download a free backup before replacing or clearing work. Restore earlier record backups or the complete current snapshot, including unfinished drafts.
- 4Prepare the finalized pack
Prepare all nine files, then download them free. Review excerpts in PDF and DOCX against the complete Excel, CSV and JSON. Optional private cloud saving requires sign-in and separate consent.
Method and sources
Apply the steps above to the supported inputs. Use the listed source sections to review the rule basis, assumptions and limits.
- Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework 1.0A voluntary US baseline for AI risk records, responsibilities, evaluation and lifecycle decisions. Govern, Map, Measure and Manage.National Institute of Standards and Technology. Published 2023-01-26. Reviewed 2026-10-08.
- AI Risk Management Framework PlaybookImplementation ideas and documentation practices for the AI RMF. Suggested actions for Govern, Map, Measure and Manage.National Institute of Standards and Technology. Published 2023-03-30. Reviewed 2026-10-08.
Common questions
What information does the ground-truth answer-key manager need?
Enter evaluation (required). Name the evaluation suite or controlled test set; item identifier (required). Use a stable identifier that does not disclose sensitive prompt content; prompt or scenario summary (required). Describe the test scenario without adding confidential material that belongs elsewhere; expected answer or behavior (required). Record the reviewer-approved answer, action or refusal behavior; authoritative source reference (required). Link the expected answer to an internal or official source. Define the named scope, accountable owner and your review basis.
What does the ground-truth answer-key manager produce?
Complete all-field record review and task-specific scope rows. Every unresolved finding stays visible. Free restorable browser backup including the unfinished draft, editing reference and review date. Nine-file finalized pack. Formal PDF, editable DOCX, complete Excel register and review sheets, records CSV, findings CSV, scope review CSV, complete JSON, file hashes and instructions. Review unresolved findings and limitations before use.
Who makes the final decision?
A responsible person reviews the result. Checks review customer declarations, recorded dates and internal consistency. They do not authenticate evidence, approve an AI use, determine legal applicability or establish conformity, safety or risk acceptance.
Is this tool free?
Yes. The on-screen result and listed downloads are free. No checkout is required. Keep local backups and review the stated method and limits.
Can I use the ground-truth answer-key manager for this task?
Version answers, rubrics and exceptions. Checks review customer declarations, recorded dates and internal consistency. They do not authenticate evidence, approve an AI use, determine legal applicability or establish conformity, safety or risk acceptance.
What still needs review?
Checks review customer declarations, recorded dates and internal consistency. They do not authenticate evidence, approve an AI use, determine legal applicability or establish conformity, safety or risk acceptance.
Each workspace supports 1000 records, 20000 characters per field and a 30 MB complete workspace. Invalid and foreign backups preserve current browser work.
PDF and DOCX show the first 20 records, field excerpts through 2000 characters and the first 40 findings. Excel, CSV and JSON retain complete values and derived rows. Referenced files are not fetched or included.