Financial-crime case quality review

What does the financial-crime case quality review produce?

Assess complete supplied-case documentation against an exact approved rubric, including missing answers, evidence gaps and customer exclusions.

Use the exact local files and task-specific inputs listed below. Preparation and review stay in this browser. Inspect all findings before preparing the finalized pack.

What do you need before you start?

• Define your scope and approved method.
• Retain actual original evidence and reviewed source references.
• Resolve input errors before preparing a complete result.

What information do you enter?

Select the actual local sources and freeze the task-specific inputs below. Keep source files and complete findings private.

• Exact reference, organization, subject, responsible reviewer and preparation date.
• Your scope and policy reference, version, approver, approval date and actual supporting source IDs.
• Named task rows, relationships, rules and evidence annotations entered through the task-specific editor.
• Unchanged original files with exact filename, MIME type, byte count and SHA-256.

What you can download

Every result must identify its supplied facts, assumptions and unresolved items.

Fictional review report (PDF). Editable review (DOCX). Complete fictional pack (ZIP). Requires tailoring and responsible review. Samples use the finalized renderer.

How does the financial-crime case quality review work?

1. 1
   Define the evidence basis

   Exact reference, organization, subject, responsible reviewer and preparation date.

2. 2
   Enter task-specific records

   Join every rubric criterion to all entered assessments. Require evidence and named rationale where selected. Honor not-applicable treatment only when the exact rubric permits it and a reason is supplied. Calculate exact documented and applicable weight points, preserving missing and conflicting assessments. Never infer a passing case or closure decision.

3. 3
   Inspect complete findings

   Review exact calculations, source gaps and unresolved items.

4. 4
   Keep recoverable work

   Save drafts and exact original bytes in this browser. Restore a complete ZIP after validating tool identity, every original hash and full prepared results. Recovery clears payment and source authorization.

5. 5
   Prepare finalized evidence

   Prepare the complete pack, then download them free.

Method and sources

Apply the steps above to the supported inputs. Use the listed source sections to review the rule basis, assumptions and limits.

• Developing Conclusions and Finalizing the ExamExaminer guidance discusses supporting evidence, findings and conclusions. A customer rubric only assesses documented supplied-case coverage, not an examiner conclusion or legal compliance.Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. Reviewed 2026-10-09.
• BSA/AML Independent TestingBank examination guidance describes risk-based independent testing, scope, workpapers and reporting. Your sampling and thresholds are not a professional assurance opinion.Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. Reviewed 2026-10-09.

Common questions

What still needs review?

Original evidence bytes, annotations and customer rules remain in this browser. Original files are not saved to the cloud. Customer verification and approval are declarations. Mechanical results do not authenticate source facts, decide legal applicability, clear screening hits, authorize transactions, classify exports, file reports or establish total wealth.

Weights are whole nonnegative integers through 999. Coverage is a documentation ratio without a pass threshold. Source correctness, case merit and compliance remain reviewer responsibilities.

At most 100 task rows, 100 KB input, 300 KB result and 500 KB workspace metadata. Original files support 20 files, 10 MB each and 25 MB total. Private cloud saving retains its separate 5 MiB file and 16 MiB total limits.

Related working records

The related workspace contains working administrative records. Open it for the related administrative task.

Related tools

Browse all financial crime and sanctions tools.

• Business-wide AML risk assessment preparationOrganize exposure, controls, assumptions and residual risks. Try a free example. Review your inputs and result. No account or payment required.
• Product and geographic risk workpaperCompare declared product and geography exposures using approved judgments and actual source evidence. Review the result.
• AML control testing plannerPrepare the testing scope and required evidence. Try a free example, then review your inputs and the result. No account or payment required.
• Independent-review evidence indexOrganize records without claiming independent assurance. Try a free example. Review your inputs and result. No account or payment required.
• Suspicious activity narrative preparationStructure verified facts for an authorized reporting decision. Try a free example. Review your inputs and result. No account or payment required.