What does the human-rights due diligence workpaper produce?
Prepare source-linked actual/potential impacts, severity dimensions, affected-group consultation, customer priority ranking and corrective actions.
Use the task-specific inputs and exact original evidence files above to prepare and review this tool in your browser. Inspect the complete named findings and scope limits before preparing the formal pack. Save unfinished work and retain the complete recovery ZIP. Customer applicability, approvals and evidence quality require responsible review.
What do you need before you start?
- Define the selected source population and your exact policy.
- Keep the original files and source pointers used for every finding.
- Resolve missing inputs and inspect unresolved findings before export.
What information do you enter?
The released tool must ask only for information needed by this bounded task.
- Case reference, organization, subject, responsible reviewer, preparation date and selected scope.
- Your policy reference, version, approver, approval date and exact supporting source IDs.
- Original file IDs, names, byte lengths and SHA-256 hashes with source locators, dates, custodians and verification assertions.
- Priority Threshold
- Scoring Instrument
- Impacts rows / reference
- Impacts rows / source IDs rows
- Impacts rows / activity
- Impacts rows / right
- Impacts rows / affected Group
- Impacts rows / actual Or Potential
- Impacts rows / scale
- Impacts rows / scope Score
- Impacts rows / irremediability
- Impacts rows / likelihood
- Impacts rows / rationale
- Impacts rows / approved By
- Impacts rows / approved On
- Consultations rows / reference
- Consultations rows / source IDs rows
- Consultations rows / item Reference
- Consultations rows / group
- Consultations rows / on
- Consultations rows / reported Input
- Consultations rows / participation Evidence
- Actions rows / reference
- Actions rows / source IDs rows
- Actions rows / item Reference
- Actions rows / owner
- Actions rows / due On
- Actions rows / status
- Actions rows / action
- Actions rows / closed On
- Actions rows / closure Evidence IDs rows
- Actions rows / approved By
- Actions rows / approved On
- Reviews rows / reference
- Reviews rows / source IDs rows
- Reviews rows / item Reference
- Reviews rows / on
- Reviews rows / position
- Reviews rows / rationale
- Reviews rows / approved By
- Reviews rows / approved On
What you can download
Every result must identify its supplied facts, assumptions and unresolved items.
| Free result | Included downloads |
|---|---|
Enter your information, inspect the on-screen result and keep a browser backup. Editing and direct copies of your entered information stay free. |
These supported outputs are free. No checkout is required. |
Fictional review report (PDF). Editable review (DOCX). Complete fictional pack (ZIP). Requires tailoring and responsible review. Samples use the finalized renderer.
How does the human-rights due diligence workpaper work?
- 1Define the selected task
Prepare source-linked actual/potential impacts, severity dimensions, affected-group consultation, customer priority ranking and corrective actions.
- 2Record exact task facts
Apply the exact selected max-severity times likelihood instrument using integer arithmetic. Join the exact impact, affected group, source-supported consultation, latest unique customer review and approved action. Preserve severity dimensions, uncertainty and qualified remedy decisions separately.
- 3Inspect complete findings
Review source links, exact calculations and every unresolved finding.
- 4Keep recoverable work
Save unfinished work and exact original bytes in this browser. A complete ZIP restores the accepted workspace and original files after integrity checks. Original checkpoints and purchased archives remain separate. Restore grants no payment or execution authority. Reprepare after rejected recovery before checkout.
- 5Prepare the completed pack
Eight core files, one member per retained original, plus any method-generated chart, synthetic data, approved draft or reporting artifact. The real component calculates the exact prepared count. Downloads are free.
Method and sources
Apply the steps above to the supported inputs. Use the listed source sections to review the rule basis, assumptions and limits.
Common questions
What information does the human-rights due diligence workpaper need?
Enter case reference, organization, subject, responsible reviewer, preparation date and selected scope; your policy reference, version, approver, approval date and exact supporting source IDs; original file IDs, names, byte lengths and SHA-256 hashes with source locators, dates, custodians and verification assertions; priority Threshold; scoring Instrument. Define the selected source population and your exact policy.
What does the human-rights due diligence workpaper produce?
Prepare source-linked actual/potential impacts, severity dimensions, affected-group consultation, customer priority ranking and corrective actions. Complete findings, exact task facts, mechanical counts and unresolved evidence gaps in Word, PDF, CSV and Excel. A source manifest binds the approved policy, public method sources, original file hashes and every supplied source pointer. A complete recovery ZIP retains unfinished drafts, prepared results and exact originals with a hashed delivery manifest. Review unresolved findings and limitations before use.
Is this tool free?
Yes. The on-screen result and listed downloads are free. No checkout is required. Keep local backups and review the stated method and limits.
Can I use the human-rights due diligence workpaper for this task?
Assemble impacts, actions and review evidence. Numeric ranking is a customer method. It neither establishes a UNGP legal classification nor replaces qualified prioritization of severe impacts, liability or remedy decisions. Up to 100 records per table within 100,000 UTF-8 bytes for the complete input, 300,000 bytes for the complete result and 500,000 bytes for the workspace. Up to 20 original files, 10,000,000 bytes per original and 25,000,000 combined original bytes. Aggregate capacity rejects rather than truncates. Originals stay in this browser. Original files are not saved to the cloud.
What still needs review?
Numeric ranking is a customer method. It neither establishes a UNGP legal classification nor replaces qualified prioritization of severe impacts, liability or remedy decisions. Up to 100 records per table within 100,000 UTF-8 bytes for the complete input, 300,000 bytes for the complete result and 500,000 bytes for the workspace. Up to 20 original files, 10,000,000 bytes per original and 25,000,000 combined original bytes. Aggregate capacity rejects rather than truncates. Originals stay in this browser. Original files are not saved to the cloud.